Academic freedom and tenure
As the AAUP details the history of its policy on academic freedom and tenure, the association maintains that there "are still people who want to control what professors teach and write." The AAUP's "Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure" is the definitive articulation of the principles and practices and is widely accepted by the academic community. The association's procedures ensuring academic due process remain the model for professional employment practices on campuses throughout the country.
At the time, the ideas of academic freedom at the time were not entirely well received, and even the New York Times criticized the declaration, but that today the statement remains "almost as nearly inviolate as the U.S. Constitution."
The AAUP offers the original principles, including the 1940 interpretations of the statement and a 1970 interpretation, which codified evaluation of the principles since the time they were adopted. The statement is straightforward, based on three principles of academic freedom. Briefly summarized, the first principle says that teachers are entitled to "full freedom in research and in publication of the results" and that the issue of financial gains from research depends on the relationship with the institution. The second principle of academic freedom is that teachers should have the same freedom in the classroom. The third asserts that college and university professors are citizens and should be free to speak and write as citizens "free from institutional censorship."
According to the 1970 interpretation, the statement is not a "static code but a fundamental document to set a framework of norms to guide adaptations to changing times and circumstances." The commentary iterates key points of the 1940 interpretations. The statement does not discourage controversy but emphasizes professionalism, holding that professors should be careful "not to introduce into their teaching controversial matter which has no relation to their subject."
The statement is based on five principles:
The terms of appointment are to be stated in writing.
The conditions and length of time professors are given to attain tenure is clearly stated
During the probationary period before attaining tenure, the teacher "should have all the academic freedom that all other members of the faculty have."
Both the faculty and the institution's governing board should judge whether tenure is to be granted or denied and terms for appeal of the decision to deny tenure should be clearly stated.
If the faculty member is not granted tenure appointment for reasons of financial restraint upon the university, the "financial exigency should be demonstrably bona fide."
The interpretive statement also maintains that while professors have the rights of citizens, both scholars and educational officers "should remember that the public may judge their profession and their institution by their utterances", noting that every effort should be made "to indicate they are not speaking for the institution". The comments provide for further insights into the evaluation for tenure appointment and direct to the "1968 Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom and Tenure", which recommends policy based upon the 1940 statement and later documents on standards for faculty dismissal.
